Refine by
Title V Articles & Analysis
41 news found
As noted in the report, “Sphera’s emissions management applications have helped large multinational firms achieve compliance with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Title V of the Clean Air Act, Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI), Australia’s National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act (NGER), the EU’s ...
A few of the EPA’s alleged violations included: Since the company had the potential to emit over 10 tons/year of acetonitrile, a hazardous air pollutant, it was subject to the Clean Air Act’s Pharmaceutical Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards (MACT) and it should have amended its Title V permit application to include the Pharmaceutical ...
The 2015 WOTUS rule was initially stayed nationwide by the Sixth Circuit in State of Ohio v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 803 F. 3d 804 (Oct. 9, 2015). ...
Users can quickly and easily generate complete and properly-formatted compliance reports, including Title V performance test reports, NPDES DMRs, and biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Reports. ...
Complying with air emissions standards is a complex, rigorous process that requires precise data, especially for companies with U.S. Clean Air Act Title V permit requirements. To meet the strict reporting criteria, many companies manually enter data on spreadsheets, increasing their risk for errors and inconsistencies, while other companies turn to costly outside ...
Customers will be able to access this valuable information through multiple EPOCH environmental reporting modules, including Chemical Inventory (Tier 1 and Tier 2), Chemical Stockroom, and 313 Form R as well as Air Emissions (Title V reporting), Waste Management, Environmental Events, Permits, Tank Inventory, and IH Sampling. ...
For all three tests, the facility’s lead emissions exceeded limits established in its Air Quality Construction Permit and Title V Operating Permit. Additional testing in 2009 revealed that particulate matter emissions also exceeded permitted limits. ...
In addition, EPA alleged that Lake Champlain Transportation failed to apply for and obtain a Clean Air Act Title V operating permit. To address the violations identified by EPA, Lake Champlain Transportation Co. will submit an implementation plan to EPA outlining how it will comply with the NESHAP. ...
The EPA's July 2012 third-step rule retained the existing permitting thresholds of Title V and prevention of significant deterioration emissions permits. New facilities that emit 100,000 tons per year of carbon dioxide-equivalent and existing facilities that increase their emissions by 75,000 tons per year of carbon dioxide-equivalent will be required to obtain ...
Majority of Emissions Still Regulated Though the decision curbs the scope of the EPA's greenhouse gas permitting program, Scalia said the EPA will still regulate 83 percent of greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources even after the court decided that greenhouse gases alone cannot trigger prevention of significant deterioration or Title V permitting ...
NPS 4 and larger systems that operate above 750°E (400°C or above 1,025 psi (7,100 kPa) Other systems may be included as CPS by an Operating Company, based on their judgment. Appendix V of the code is titled 'Recommended Practice for Operation, Maintenance, and Modification of Power Piping Systems'. This addendum is non-mandatory; however many Power ...
The Energy Answers Arecibo LLC permit is one of the first to address emissions from biomass in the wake of a 2013 federal appeals court decision vacating an Environmental Protection Agency rule that exempted biogenic greenhouse gases from the Clean Air Act's prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) and Title V permitting requirements, attorneys and forestry ...
As a major source of hazardous air pollutants, the company was also required to obtain a Clean Air Act Title V permit, which it did not have. In addition, the company failed to report its 2007 toluene emissions to the Toxics Release Inventory. ...
The United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky have reached a settlement with the AK Steel Corporation (AK Steel) in Ashland, Ky., resolving alleged violations of the Clean Air Act, AK Steel’s title V permit, and the Kentucky State Implementation Plan, announced the Department of Justice and the U.S. ...
The settlement also requires the facility to demonstrate compliance with CAA National Emission Standards for Pharmaceuticals Production (PharmaMACT regulations) and to apply for a Title V permit. The PharmaMACT regulations impose “Maximum Achievable Control Technology” (MACT) standards, which are industry-specific measures that must be implemented to ...
In addition, EPA alleged that Blount failed to either apply for and obtain a Clean Air Act Title V operating permit or apply for and obtain an emission cap permit. ...
Environmental Protection Agency plans to modify the Clean Air Act Title V operating permit for Veolia ES Technical Solutions LLC in Sauget, Illinois. ...
The violations are covered under “MACT” standards under the federal Clean Air Act and state-issued permits, including a Title V Operating Permit. MACT standards are intended to control hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) through “maximum achievable control technology” for maximum emission reductions at major sources of HAPs like the Indian ...
EPA determined that the facility had the potential to emit sufficient pollutants to be subject to the Clean Air Act National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Printing and Publishing Facilities and to require a Title V operating permit under the Clean Air Act. Hazardous air pollutants can pose serious risks to the public, and it is critical ...
” According to a complaint filed with the settlement, Elm Ridge allegedly violated provisions of the Title V Federal Operating Permit Program and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under the Clean Air Act. ...